Using RedSeal for Cybersecurity and Compliance
A recent study by independent industry analysts at TAG Infosphere concluded that the exposure analytics capabilities of the RedSeal platform— specifically, network modeling, attack path analysis, risk prioritization, and compliance management— are well-suited to reduce risk and strengthen the security posture of complex hybrid networks.
Click here to download the full report and schedule a demo today.
Today’s cloud infrastructure is complex and constantly evolving. In the cloud, security controls are implemented by developers and DevOps teams while on-premises controls are implemented by the firewall/network operations teams. These can create significant knowledge gaps, leading to unknown attack points.
Most security spending these days is focused on the cloud and treated as a silo, but you can’t afford to ignore your on-prem resources and how the two entities work together.
With resources moving to the cloud, most of the attention moves to cloud security and protecting the cloud perimeter and resources. Yet on-prem resources also have connections and exposure. However, you need a comprehensive security strategy that protects both cloud and on-premises resources.
Many organizations and vendors struggle with getting this comprehensive picture. For example, in many companies, in-house teams are responsible for managing on-prem resources while other teams or third-party providers monitor the security of cloud resources. At the same time, you have DevOps teams that are constantly evolving the cloud environment.
The products and tools being used in the cloud and on-premises domains are often disconnected and speak different languages as do the teams using them.
The problem is not people, however. It’s often the tools being used, like having a separate doorman on the front door (cloud) and back door (on-prem), and they both speak different languages and often have competing goals. While security teams are focused on mitigating exposure, DevOps teams are looking for a faster way to bring products to market. Competing goals can only aggravate language barriers.
Even highly skilled teams may not understand how other teams work. The technology is different, the configurations are different, and some nuances require expert interpretation and experience. Few team members will be conversant in both on-prem and cloud resources.
More than 90 percent of large organizations already employ multi cloud strategies; 80 percent use hybrid clouds.
This creates an even greater complexity for security and management. For example, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud use different names for instances and virtual machines. Azure calls them virtual machines (VMs), while Amazon has Elastic Cloud Compute (EC2) and Google has the Google Cloud Compute Engine.
Even when the same term is used, it can mean different things. For example, a virtual private cloud (VPC) exists in both AWS and Google, but they are different and operate differently.
This only increases the language barrier that hinders a comprehensive approach to security.
Organizations also assume their cloud service provider (CSP) will protect assets in the cloud. While CSPs such as AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud, and others provide robust security for their networks, it’s still the customer’s responsibility to protect their data.
Gartner estimates that 99 percent of cloud security failures are the fault of the customer, not the CSP. The sheer volume of configuration settings and pathways to critical resources makes it difficult to manage security in the cloud. When you add in on-premises data centers or servers that are connected, the infrastructure becomes even more complex.
Constant monitoring and continuous compliance should be a shared responsibility between providers and organizations.
Most vendor security solutions are only as effective as how they’re configured. Yet few are monitoring that and telling you where these configurations are causing potential problems.
You need a comprehensive, end-to-end understanding of your cloud and on-prem infrastructure to analyze every configuration and security policy. While you may have cloud security tools for each environment, you need complete cloud network visibility to protect your infrastructure, look for exposure, and find security gaps.
Nearly every organization has at least some on-premises that are connected. The challenge often comes when it’s time to configure the right access for communication. You need to ensure that nobody on the cloud side can attack on-prem resources or vice versa. That’s why total visibility is essential.
If you’re not seeing the whole picture, it’s easy to miss attack points. Securing your infrastructure requires you to detail what you have, how it’s connected, and what’s at risk.
You need to:
Only then can you remediate problems and plug security gaps. You must understand how your cloud and on-prem resources are all interconnected to determine and mitigate your total risk.
Some organizations turn to Cloud Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) as a way to provide visibility amid the complexities and the constant evolution of hybrid resources. Yet all existing CNAPP solutions don’t understand on-Premises and are insufficient to identify access via all attack path and associated risk. Most tools call into the application programming interfaces of cloud service providers, looking for misconfigurations at the compute and container levels. However, they don’t fully understand end-to-end access.
CNAPP is an important weapon in the battle to secure the cloud, but most vendor solutions simply do not provide the total visibility you need across cloud and on-prem resources. RedSeal solves these problems.
RedSeal on-premises and RedSeal Stratus in the cloud provide a complete view of the entire infrastructure. They identify the gaps in your security by pinpointing attack points and any hidden pathways. This analysis also determines the underlying reason why these attack points exist and what needs to happen to remediate them.
RedSeal solutions also work across borders. They provide the platform to speak to DevOps and firewall/network operations teams in the right way, helping eliminate language barriers. This way, you get benefits across borders for cloud and on-prem, enabling you to identify security issues across the entire infrastructure by driving collaborations between the teams and building trust.
On-premise and cloud resources cannot be protected in a silo. Working in tandem with a shared responsibility model, a hybrid solution with RedSeal provides continuous monitoring and compliance across both on-prem and cloud resources, identifies gaps, and helps you protect your entire infrastructure.
The cloud has arrived. According to data from the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), 89% of organizations now host sensitive data or workloads in the cloud. But increased use doesn’t necessarily mean better protection: 44% of companies feel “moderately” able to protect this data, and 33% say they’re only “slightly” confident in their defense.
With cloud networks growing exponentially, businesses need a new way to handle both existent and emerging threats. Cloud-native applications protection platforms (CNAPP) offer an integrated, end-to-end security approach that can help companies better manage current conditions and prepare for future attacks.
As noted by research firm Gartner in their August 2021 Innovation Insight for Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms report (paywall), CNAPP is “an integrated set of security and compliance capabilities designed to help secure and protect cloud-native applications across development and production.”
The goal of CNAPP solutions is to protect cloud-based applications across their entire lifecycle, from initial deployment and integration to regular use and maintenance to eventual end-of-life. Rather than taking a point-based approach to security that sees companies adopting multiple solutions which may (or may not) work in tandem to solve security issues, CNAPP looks to provide a single user interface and a single source of truth for all cloud-related security processes.
In effect, this approach prioritizes the centralization of cloud security processes to help companies better manage disparate applications and services.
Effective security relies on effective attack path analysis – the categorization and protection of pathways. In a traditional infrastructure model, these pathways were relatively simple, stretching from internal resources to Internet applications and back.
Highways offer a simple analogy. Say that your resources are in San Francisco, California, and the Internet is in San Jose. Different highways offer different paths to the same destination. Installing checkpoints along these highways, meanwhile, makes it possible for companies to ensure that cars heading into San Francisco or back to San Jose have permission to do so. If they don’t, they’re not allowed to proceed.
The cloud significantly complicates this process by adding a host of new destinations and attack pathways, both on the ground and in the air. Where companies might have managed 50 potential points of compromise, in the cloud this number could be 5000 or 50,000 —and is constantly growing. Plus it is 100x easy to misconfigure the points of compromise.
As a result, there are both more vehicles traveling and more routes for them to travel, in turn making it 100x more complicated to see and secure the cloud. This in turn, increases the risk of traffic getting into or out of your network without the proper permissions, resulting in everything from lateral compromise to ransomware payloads to advanced persistent threats (APTs).
Clouds also create a challenge when it comes to third-party protection. While cloud-native applications are evolving to meet new enterprise requirements, well-known or specialized third-party solutions are often tapped for additional security controls or to provide enhanced functionality. In our traffic example, this means that different checkpoints are managed by different vendors that may not always speak the same language or use the same metrics. This means it’s possible for one of these checkpoints to report a false positive or negative, in turn putting your local cloud environment at risk.
CNAPP solutions makes it possible to centralize security management for greater visibility and control. According to Gartner, this is accomplished via five key components:
Working together, these solutions make it possible for companies to see what’s happening in their cloud network environments, when, and why, in turn allowing IT teams to prioritize alerts and take immediate action. Consider the RedSeal Stratus CNAPP solution, which provides companies with a “blueprint map” of their entire cloud framework to identify where resources are located and full attack path analysis to identify where they are exposed.
In the context of our highway example, RedSeal Stratus makes it possible to map every possible path and checkpoint taken, in addition to providing information about each exposed resource at risk in San Francisco and who can get to them within minutes. This makes it possible to assess the net effective reachability of all aspects of your cloud and pinpoint areas that require specific action.
Put simply, CNAPP is the future of cloud security, but it’s not a monolithic, one-size-fits-all solution. Given the rapidly-changing scope and nature of cloud services, CNAPP solutions won’t be one-vendor affairs but rather a consolidation of differing vendor specialties under a unified platform model that provides a single pane of glass visibility for users.
Moving forward, companies should expect an increasing focus on the data residing in the resources as the core component of CNAPP. This includes not only a focus on how they are accessible and permissions but on positively identifying where they’re located, what they’re doing, who is accessing them, risks and how they interact with other services and solutions both on-Premise and cloud.
CNAPP is coming of age. Make sure you’re ready for the next generation of cloud security with RedSeal.
The cyber insurance world has changed dramatically.
Premiums have risen significantly, and insurers are placing more limits on covered items. Industries like healthcare, retail, and government, where exposure is high, have been hit hard. Many organizations have seen huge rate increases for substantially less coverage than in the past. Others have seen their policies canceled or been unable to renew.
In many cases, insurers are offering half the coverage amounts at a higher cost. For example, some insurers that had previously issued $5 million liability policies have now reduced amounts to $1 million to $3 million while raising rates. Even with reduced coverage, some policy rates have risen by as much as 300%.
At the same time, insurers are leaving the field. Big payoffs in small risk pools can devastate profitability for insurers. Many insurers are reaching the break-even point where a single covered loss can wipe out years of profits. In fact, several major insurance companies have stopped issuing new cybersecurity insurance policies altogether.
This is in part to incidents like the recent Merck legal victory forcing a $1.4B payout due to the NotPetya’s malware attack. According to Fitch Ratings, more than 8,100 cyber insurance claims were paid out in 2021, the third straight year that claims increased by at least 100%. Payments from claims jumped 200% annually in 2019, 2020, and 2021 as well.
Claims are also being denied at higher rates. With such large amounts at stake, insurers are looking more closely at an organization’s policies and requiring proof that the organization is taking the right steps to protect itself. Companies need to be thinking about better ways to manage more of the cyber risks themselves. Cyber insurance isn’t enough anymore.
At the heart of all of this drama is ransomware. The State of Ransomware 2022 report from Sophos includes some sobering statistics.
Ransomware attacks nearly doubled in 2021 vs. 2020, and ransom payments are higher as cybercriminals are demanding more money. In 2020, only 4% of organizations paid more than $1 million in ransoms. In 2021, that number jumped to 11%. The average ransomware paid by organizations in significant ransomware attacks grew by 500% last year to $812,360.
More companies are paying the ransom as well. Nearly half (46%) of companies hit by ransomware chose to pay despite FBI warnings not to do so. The FBI says paying ransoms encourages threat actors to target even more victims.
Even with cyber insurance, it can take months to fully recover from a ransomware attack and cause significant damage to a company’s reputation. Eighty-six percent (86%) of companies in the Sophos study said they lost business and revenue because of an attack. While 98% of cyber insurance claims were paid out, only four out of ten companies saw all of their costs paid.
There’s some evidence that cybercriminals are actively targeting organizations that have cyber insurance specifically because companies are more likely to pay. This has led to higher ransom demands, contributing to the cyber insurance crisis. At the same time, there’s been a significant increase in how cybercriminals are exacting payments.
Ransomware attackers are now often requiring two payments. The first is for providing the decryption key to unlock encrypted data. A demand for a separate payment is made to avoid releasing the data itself publicly. Threat actors are also hitting the same organizations more than once. When they know they’ll get paid, they often increase efforts to attack a company a second or third time until they lock down their security.
Organizations must deploy strict guidelines and protocols for security and follow them to protect themselves. Even one small slip-up in following procedures can result in millions or even billions of dollars in losses and denied claims.
The root cause of most breaches and ransomware attacks is a breakdown in processes, allowing an attack vector to be exploited. This breakdown often occurs because there is a lack of controls or adherence to these controls by the people using the network.
Whether organizations decide to pay the price for cyber insurance or not, they need to take proactive steps to ensure they have the right policies in place, have robust processes for managing control, and train their team members on how to protect organizational assets.
Organizations also need a skilled cybersecurity workforce to deploy and maintain protection along with the right tech tools.
Even with all of this in place, strong cybersecurity demands continuous monitoring and testing. Networks are rarely stable. New devices and endpoints are added constantly. New software, cloud services, and third-party solutions are deployed. With such fluidity, it’s important to continually identify potential security gaps and take proactive measures to harden your systems.
One of the first steps is understanding your entire network environment and potential vulnerabilities. For example, RedSeal’s cloud cybersecurity solution can create a real-time visualization of your network and continuously monitor your production environment and traffic. This provides a clear understanding of how data flows through your network to create a cyber risk model.
Users get a Digital Resilience Score which can be used to demonstrate their network’s security posture to cyber insurance providers.
This also helps organizations identify risk factors and compromised devices. Also, RedSeal provides a way to trace access throughout an entire network showing where an attacker can go once inside a network. This helps identify places where better segmentation is required to prevent unauthorized lateral movement.
In case an attack occurs, RedSeal accelerates incident responses by providing a more complete road map for containment.
With escalating activity and larger demands, cyber insurance is only likely to get more expensive and harder to get. Companies will also have to offer more proof about their security practices to be successful in filing claims or risk having claims denied.
For more information about how we can help you protect your network and mitigate the risks of successful cyber-attacks, contact RedSeal today.
Manufacturing companies face increasing risk from cyberattacks. As noted by IBM’s Security Intelligence blog, ransomware incidents rose more than 150 percent across the manufacturing sector from Q1 2019 to Q1 2020. Other recent survey data found that two-thirds of manufacturing firms believe their data breach risk has increased over the past two years.
There’s no single cause for this upward threat trajectory — the combination of always-on connected devices with growing cloud computing use and the increasing need for big data analysis in production planning and management all play a role in the evolution of manufacturing attacks.
Here’s a look at the underlying causes, possible impacts, and potential remedies for the top four manufacturing cybersecurity threats.
Industry 4.0 changes the way manufacturing companies conduct day-to-day operations. From the use of always-connected sensors and devices that make up the industrial Internet of things (IIoT) to the integration of “smart devices” capable of proactively predicting maintenance needs, the digitization of Industry 4.0 represents a significant leap forward for manufacturing firms.
Unlike its operational predecessors — mechanization (1.0), mass production (2.0), automation (3.0), and globalization (3.5) — Industry 4.0 represents a substantive move into the world of always-on, always-connected devices. While this provides a wealth of data to help companies make better-informed manufacturing decisions, it also introduces significant risk. Frameworks such as industrial control systems (ICS) and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) solutions that were historically cut off from external Internet connections are now part of a larger integrated ecosystem. Often, this ecosystem lacks the security controls and oversight necessary to identify and eliminate risks.
Cloud computing also plays a significant role in the shift to Industry 4.0 as firms look for ways to connect disparate tools and systems across both local facilities and global operations. The result is significant spend by manufacturing firms on robust cloud services. Recent data suggests the cloud market for manufacturing will grow by more than 15 percent year-over-year for the next five years.
But increasing cloud adoption also comes with a concern: complexity. As more applications and services are added to existing IT infrastructure, it’s easy for teams to lose track of what’s been deployed, where, and why. Consider the addition of public cloud services to help bolster computing resources and the storage of big data. Traditionally, these functions reside on-site, making it easy for teams to monitor operations. But as functions shift into the cloud, IT staff must contend with multiple layers of network connection and communication. As a consequence, teams find it harder to see exactly what’s going on — which potentially exposes key data to cybersecurity risk.
For manufacturing firms, four cybersecurity threats are now common: Data exfiltration, ransomware, phishing, and insider attacks. Let’s break down each in more detail.
1. Data Exfiltration
Data exfiltration occurs when attackers compromise manufacturing networks and then steal data to share or sell. Exfiltration often starts with malware — malicious actors may use legitimate-seeming emails that convince users to click links or download attachments, which then deploy malware to infiltrate network-connected storage systems. Personnel, product, or financial data is then in the hands of hackers, who may sell it on the dark web or threaten its release unless companies agree to pay for its return.
Take the example of Titan Manufacturing and Distributing. The company’s network was compromised by data exfiltration malware for almost a year, during which time attackers stole the names, billing addresses, and payment card details of more than 1,800 customers.
2. Ransomware
Another major threat to manufacturers is ransomware. This threat vector sees attackers infecting systems with programs designed to encrypt critical manufacturing data, rendering it inaccessible for companies. Then, they demand payment for decryption keys and threaten to delete or sell the information if their demands aren’t met.
Ransomware was responsible for the 2019 attack on Norwegian aluminum company Norsk Hydro, which has manufacturing operations in more than 40 companies worldwide. While the company didn’t pay the ransom, removing malicious code and remediating the damage — combined with lost revenue — cost the company almost $75 million.
3. Phishing
Phishing attacks happen when cybercriminals attempt to convince corporate users that they’re legitimate business contacts or members of the organization itself. In some cases, the intent of phishing attacks is to have users supply login credentials as part of a fake “reset” or “verification” process. In other situations, attackers attempt to compel specific — and costly — action. For example, attackers masquerading as C-suite executives may try to trick users into transferring funds into foreign bank accounts or request detailed HR data about specific employees. If staff can be convinced these emails are authentic, they often comply with requests immediately rather than double-checking because they don’t want to risk a management-level rebuke.
This was the case for aircraft parts manufacturer FACC. Attackers were able to convince multiple users that the CEO wanted money transferred into foreign accounts. The result was a loss of $61 million and civil prosecution of both the former CEO and chief financial officer for failing to detect and stop the fraud before it occurred.
4. Insider Attacks
Insider attacks may be the result of malicious action or accidental misuse of networks and data by employees. In either case, however, the results are the same: Manufacturing data is exposed, and corporate operations are put at risk. As noted by Industry Week, manufacturing firms now rank among the top five industries with the highest number of insider threats, and the average cost of an insider threat for a single manufacturing firm is more than $8.8 million.
To reduce the risk of manufacturing cybersecurity threats, firms need to follow three critical best practices.
Improved Visibility
As cloud and IIoT connections become more complex, it’s easy for teams to lose network visibility. This often creates a situation that sees companies acting based on what they think their network looks like rather than its actual structure. As a result, improved visibility is the first step on the road to enhanced cybersecurity.
Enhanced Agility
Agility is also critical. With cyberattacks on the rise, it’s now a matter of when not if firms will be attacked. Consequently, organizations must be prepared to respond ASAP if threats or vulnerabilities are detected across their networks.
Increased Access Control
As the number of public-facing connections and services increases, companies need granular access control to ensure that the right people are accessing the right data at the right time. Additionally, they must have processes to flag potential malicious actors are flagged and refuse access.
Making the most of cybersecurity starts by recognizing the risk: Threats such as data exfiltration, ransomware, phishing, and insider attacks are now commonplace and costly.
Firms must also account for the increasing attack surfaces created by cloud-enabled Industry 4.0 deployments. From unintentional exposure to public-facing Internet connections to previously undiscovered vulnerabilities, the move to modern infrastructure comes with a commensurate threat increase.
What can organizations do to protect themselves? To mitigate the impact of evolving threats, companies need security solutions capable of delivering improved visibility, enhancing overall agility, and increasing access control. Only then can organizations fortify themselves against threats and protect their growth and profitability.
Ready to get started? Find more information here or sign up for a live demo of RedSeal for manufacturers.
GovLoop | October 26, 2021
President Joe Biden’s executive order (EO) on cybersecurity suggests the cloud will play a pivotal role in the federal government’s future; it urges agencies to maximize the technology’s flexibility and scalability rapidly and securely.
But what can happen if agencies embrace the cloud too rapidly? The answer is haphazard and insecure IT environments. These environments often occur when agencies combine on-premises and cloud-based IT in a hybrid model.
Today’s business applications run in an environment that would be unrecognizable to IT professionals 10 years ago. The rise of virtualization and the cloud has finally cut the ties to specific hardware, and all but the most exotic workloads can now be run anywhere — on virtual machines in your physical buildings, or on a cloud vendor of your choice. The underlying cloud technologies are powerful, but with that power comes great responsibility. Security teams struggle to keep up, because the new technologies focus on agility, rapid rate of change, and dynamic response — all of these are positive buzzwords to most people in a business, but all of them are bad news to security. Ask any military commander — defense is far easier when your resources are home in a well-built fort, and far harder when your troops are constantly moving, shifting location into unfamiliar terrain.
It’s not all doom and gloom, however. Cloud innovation takes away certain legacy risks — after all, you can’t leave an open password on a key router in the middle of your network infrastructure if you don’t control the routers any more! The trouble is that the change to new ways of building and managing modern apps (often referred to as DevOps) closes out some old challenges, but opens just as many new ones. Cloud gives you new kinds of rope, and it’s different from the old rope, but you can still get just as tangled up in the complexities.
Some security fundamentals remain, though. No matter what kind of infrastructure you own or rent, you still need to pursue the basics:
1. Find all your stuff
2. Categorize it so you know what’s most important
3. Harden the individual elements to avoid easy compromise
4. Map out and run your defenses as a system, so you can be a hard target
The most basic discipline of all is inventory — cyber security experts and industry guidance all agree that you must start there. Inventory in cloud is not like inventory in conventional networks, though, so the same old principle has to be thought about differently in a cloud world.
The good news with the cloud is that each virtual network has a “God of the Cloud” — a central controller, run by the cloud provider that you can talk to via a proprietary API. I call it a “God”, because no endpoints can exist in that small virtual network that the controller did not create. This means you can always find a completely reliable resource for each virtual network — someone who knows the inventory. Problem solved, right? Well, not so fast — it’s certainly very different from legacy on-premises networks, but that’s hardly all there is to it. There are three major problems when talking to each cloud controller — finding the controllers, speaking their language, and keeping up with the changes.
The good news is a cloud account comes with an API you can talk to and get a complete inventory of the assets it knows about. The bad news is your company has many, many accounts. And even once you locate them all, they will speak a proprietary and changing language — the Amazon language for the AWS API is different from Microsoft’s for Azure, or Google’s, or Oracle’s. You need a network linguist to make sense of it all, and pull together a single view of your clouds — in all flavors. And since security is central by its nature (because it needs to look at the complete picture), that means security has the unenviable task of needing to speak all the languages — fluently — at once. This is hard, but it’s a great job for automated software.
Equally, the rate of change in the cloud is something automated software can tackle far more effectively than humans can. Cloud assets have ugly names — often just a long stream of gibberish assigned by a robot, to make it easy for other robots. You’ll need your own robot interpreter to even identify one asset, let alone track it as it moves and changes. The nature of the cloud is highly dynamic — instances are spun up and killed on demand, and they move far faster than, say, a classic vulnerability scanner can keep up with. If you want to see your final as-built infrastructure (and you need to, since this is what your adversary is looking at too), you need software to keep up with all the changes, track the assets, and untangle the myriad ways that cloud assets are marked. There are tags, there are labels, there are unique ID’s, and there are security groups. Every vendor has subtly different rules, and just to add to the confusion cloud vendors don’t even agree on what a cloud network should be called, but they all offer the same idea.
At the end of the day, security is about adapting and keeping up, as the pace of change keeps speeding up. Cloud is just the latest evolution, where names change, details shift, but the core principles remain — first and strongest of all is inventory. This is why we at RedSeal build software to automate all the communication and mapping, so that you can visually scan your cloud footprint, understand your security posture, and make optimal moves to increase your security and reduce your risk.
For more information, check out our overview of RedSeal Stratus Maps and Inventory capabilities to learn more about how you can Map Your AWS Infrastructure Including Connectivity Paths.
In 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic had a dramatic impact on how and where we do business. For many enterprises, the “where” became the cloud – immediately. This rapid adoption of the cloud – in most cases multiple clouds – created a rapid increase in security issues. Suddenly, enterprises had new cloud security requirements they needed to understand and deploy without the benefit of time to learn. The complexity continued to increase, and this triggered new security issues with potentially costly consequences. These included:
To maintain cloud security and reduce–if not totally eliminate–the impact of these serious security issues, enterprises need a proven cybersecurity framework to address these issue directly.
Steps to strengthen your cloud security
Cloud environments are dynamic and constantly evolving. These 5 steps provide a proven framework to improve your enterprise’s cloud security using a technology driven approach, even in a multi-cloud environment.
Implementing success
While the risks grew for many enterprises this past year as they rapidly moved to the cloud, several have dodged the bullet. RedSeal has helped many successfully adopt a strong security framework and gained actionable insights into their cloud environments. These insights were often an eye-opener.
With RedSeal, all these enterprises, and more, have utilized a multi-cloud security methodology that highlights: Visualization/Inventory, Exposure, Industry Best Practices, Policy Validation, and Vulnerability Prioritization. These 5 steps can bring peace of mind to security teams who have had to act quickly and without warning in response to this most unprecedented year.
Learn More
Looking for more details on how 3rd party firewalls may impact your cloud security framework? Download our whitepaper “How Should I Secure My Cloud?”
RedSeal’s Cloud Security Solution -Ensure Your Critical Cloud Resources Aren’t Exposed to the Internet
—
[1] AWS uses the term VPC (Virtual Private Cloud) and Azure uses the term VNet (Virtual Network). Conceptually, they provide the bedrock for provisioning resources and services in the cloud. However, there is variability in implementation.
SIGNAL Magazine | April 9, 2018
By Wayne Lloyd, RedSeal Federal CTO
From an industry perspective there are many advantages to moving aspects of any organization to the cloud. In theory, cloud is more efficient and easier to manage, but organizations like the Defense Department need to make sure they are not bringing along their bad habits and old baggage with them. Legacy networks are hard to understand and have grown out of control in the last few decades. Cloud is as complex as legacy networks, but the difference is who or what is really maintaining them.
Forbes | April 4, 2018
By Dr. Mike Lloyd, RedSeal CTO
